Legal challenge to Vic's electric vehicle tax
A case has been filed by two drivers against the controversial electric vehicle tax in Victoria.
In the High Court legal challenge, the drivers will argue that the state of Victoria lacks the constitutional power to levy a road user charge on electric vehicle drivers.
In July 2021, the Victorian Government introduced a new tax which charges electric vehicle drivers between 2 cents and 2.5 cents for every kilometre they drive.
Melbourne father and nurse manager Chris Vanderstock, one of the drivers bringing the case, uses his car for his daily work commute, and said he had additional concerns regarding the constitutional validity of the laws.
“Instead of taxing clean technologies, the Victorian Government should be concentrating on getting dirty cars off the road,” Vanderstock said.
“Electric vehicles are cleaner and improve health and climate outcomes for everybody.
“Why is the Victorian Government taxing electric vehicles when they have a demonstrable health benefit?”
Melbourne mother and engineering consultant Kathleen Davies, the second electric vehicle driver mounting the High Court challenge, said she bought her first electric vehicle in 2012 to help reduce her family’s environmental impact.
“Not only are electric vehicles better for the environment, they are also cheaper to run,” Davies said.
“Electric vehicles are becoming more affordable every year, but this tax is a backward step for people wanting to transition to a cleaner and more economical car.
“Victoria’s electric vehicle tax is fundamentally flawed and impractical. It punishes electric vehicle drivers and discourages the urgent need to decarbonise.”
Jack McLean, lawyer for the drivers, said his clients would argue that the state of Victoria lacked the constitutional power to levy the tax.
“In addition to the validity of the tax, our clients are concerned it’s also bad public policy,” McLean said.
“It discourages everyday Australians from switching to lower emission vehicles, prolonging our dependence on polluting oil.
“It’s bad for Victorians, it’s bad for the climate and we will argue that it is unconstitutional.”
The case was filed by Equity Generation Lawyers.
CICCADA project to analyse Australia's consumer energy
The $4.3m initiative will examine the use of consumer energy resources in order to understand how...
NSW EV charging network expands
A new initiative has brought 39 pole-mounted kerbside chargers to Sydney’s inner west, with...
SA Power Networks to trial eco-switchgear
The network operator will be extending an existing partnership with Schneider Electric in order...
