Auroras could threaten electrical infrastructure

Spectacular auroras like the ones seen in the solar storm of May 2024 can cause damage to critical infrastructure, according to recent research.

Auroras are produced when particles from the sun hit the Earth’s magnetic field and cause a geomagnetic storm or when interplanetary shocks compress Earth’s magnetic field. These shocks also generate geomagnetically induced currents, which can damage infrastructure that conducts electricity. More powerful interplanetary shocks mean more powerful currents and auroras — but frequent, less powerful shocks could also do damage.

Scientists writing in Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences have demonstrated that the impact angle of interplanetary shocks is an important factor in the currents’ strength — a finding that could help to forecast dangerous shocks and shield critical infrastructure.

“Auroras and geomagnetically induced currents are caused by similar space weather drivers,” said Dr Denny Oliveira of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, the lead author of the article. “The aurora is a visual warning that indicates that electric currents in space can generate these geomagnetically induced currents on the ground.”

Oliveira said the auroral region could expand greatly during severe geomagnetic storms. “Usually, its southernmost boundary is around latitudes of 70 degrees, but during extreme events it can go down to 40 degrees or even further, which certainly occurred during the May 2024 storm — the most severe storm in the past two decades,” he said.

“Arguably, the most intense deleterious effects on power infrastructure occurred in March 1989 following a severe geomagnetic storm — the Hydro-Quebec system in Canada was shut down for nearly nine hours, leaving millions of people with no electricity,” Oliveira continued.

“But weaker, more frequent events such as interplanetary shocks can pose threats to ground conductors over time. Our work shows that considerable geoelectric currents occur quite frequently aftershocks, and they deserve attention.”

When shocks hit the Earth head-on, rather than at an angle, they are thought to induce stronger geomagnetically induced currents because they compress the magnetic field more. The scientists investigated how geomagnetically induced currents are affected by shocks at different angles and times of day.

To do this, they took a database of interplanetary shocks and cross-referenced it with readings of geomagnetically induced currents from a natural gas pipeline in Mäntsälä, Finland, which is generally in the auroral region during active times.

To calculate the properties of these shocks, such as angle and speed, they used interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind data. The shocks were divided into three groups: highly inclined shocks, moderately inclined shocks and nearly frontal shocks.

They found that more frontal shocks cause higher peaks in geomagnetically induced currents both immediately after the shock and during the following substorm. Particularly intense peaks took place around magnetic midnight.

“Moderate currents occur shortly after the perturbation impact when Mäntsälä is around dusk local time, whereas more intense currents occur around midnight local time,” Oliveira said.

Because the angles of these shocks can be predicted up to two hours before impact, this information could allow protections to be put in place for electricity grids and other vulnerable infrastructure before the strongest and most head-on shocks strike.

“One thing power infrastructure operators could do to safeguard their equipment is to manage a few specific electric circuits when a shock alert is issued,” Oliveira said. “This would prevent geomagnetically induced currents reducing the lifetime of the equipment.”

Something the scientists did not find was a strong correlation between the angle of a shock and the time it takes for it to hit and then induce a current. This may be because more recordings of currents at different latitudes are needed to investigate this aspect.

“Current data was collected only at a particular location, namely the Mäntsälä natural gas pipeline system,” Oliveira said.

“Although Mäntsälä is at a critical location, it does not provide a worldwide picture. In addition, the Mäntsälä data is missing several days in the period investigated, which forced us to discard many events in our shock database. It would be nice to have worldwide power companies make their data accessible to scientists for studies.”

Image credit: iStock.com/RelaxFoto.de